Case Results

Our client sustained significant injuries to her hip and back after slipping on a large puddle of water inside a grocery store while walking toward the restroom. Through aggressive litigation, we uncovered that the store had placed no wet-floor signs, rugs, or barriers in the specific area of our client’s fall, despite emergency personnel noting such precautions around other puddles in different sections of the store.

Critically, we discovered evidence of a known roof leak directly above the accident area. Both the store management and the plaza owner had previously received numerous complaints and inspection reports clearly identifying the leak and its ongoing hazard. Depositions of corporate representatives and managers conclusively established that this roof leak was a persistent, unresolved issue, known well in advance by both the store and the property owner.

As a result of exposing these failures and negligence through rigorous litigation, we secured a substantial recovery of $350,000 for our client, providing justice and accountability for her injuries.

Our client sustained severe injuries to her neck, back, and shoulder after tripping on a loose paver directly outside her residence within her condominium complex. When we took over the case, the condominium management had made no settlement offers, alleging that the incident was either staged or resulted from our client’s own impairment.

Through aggressive and meticulous litigation, we uncovered extensive evidence showing that the condominium management was fully aware of the dangerous condition. The specific area had been the subject of repeated resident complaints and internal board communications, which explicitly acknowledged the loose pavers as a serious safety hazard. Despite numerous warnings and recommendations from their own contractor—who emphasized that the pavers were inappropriate for heavy foot traffic—neither the condominium management nor the contractor implemented effective corrective measures.

By establishing clear negligence and effectively rebutting the other party’s unfounded accusations, we secured a substantial recovery of $325,000 for our client. This result provided her with meaningful compensation and accountability for the injuries she suffered due to the other partys’ failure to maintain a safe environment.

Our client sustained serious injuries while lawfully on the premises of a commercial property due to the property owner’s negligence. The incident occurred when she was caused to fall as a result of unsafe and hazardous conditions that the property owner failed to address. Despite the duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition, the owner allowed a dangerous situation to persist, directly resulting in our client’s injuries.

Following the fall, our client experienced significant pain and required immediate medical care. She was evaluated for injuries to her back, hip, and lower extremities, with diagnostic testing confirming damage that required ongoing treatment. She underwent extensive therapy, pain management, and follow-up care, with physicians warning of potential long-term complications. Her injuries have left her with physical limitations that continue to affect her mobility and quality of life.

The impact has extended beyond the physical injuries. She has endured emotional distress, difficulty performing daily activities, and restrictions that have significantly diminished her independence. The fall has disrupted her personal life and created a lasting sense of insecurity in public spaces.

The property owner’s failure to maintain safe premises was clear, and we pressed for a resolution that properly reflects the seriousness of our client’s injuries and the long-term consequences she will continue to face.

Our client sustained a serious ankle fracture after tripping on uneven pavement while delivering pizzas to a residence. The hazard was not marked, and the condition of the walkway presented a hidden danger to individuals performing routine deliveries to the property.

Through aggressive litigation and investigation, we established that the property owner had prior knowledge of the uneven and deteriorating pavement but failed to take corrective action. The lack of maintenance and failure to warn of the hazard directly contributed to the incident and the severity of my client’s injury.

Our client was injured in a trucking accident caused by the negligence of a commercial driver operating a tractor-trailer on a busy Florida highway. The truck driver failed to maintain proper attention and control of his vehicle, leading to a violent rear-end collision that crushed our client’s vehicle and caused devastating injuries. Liability was clear, as the truck driver violated multiple safety rules of the road and industry standards designed to protect motorists from exactly this type of danger.

Following the crash, our client was rushed to the hospital with significant trauma to the spine, neck, and shoulders. Diagnostic testing confirmed multiple herniated discs and nerve compression injuries. He underwent extensive medical treatment, including injections, pain management, and ultimately spinal surgery to address his worsening condition.

We sought full compensation for his damages, including medical bills, lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, and future medical needs. The trucking company and its driver demonstrated clear negligence, and we pressed for a resolution that reflects both the seriousness of our client’s injuries.

In December 2021, our client was stopped at a red light in Weston, Florida, when her vehicle was rear-ended by a distracted driver. The facts of the case left no doubt as to liability—the driver admitted he was aware of heavy traffic and a red signal ahead, yet failed to slow down or apply his brakes, striking our client’s vehicle at full speed. Florida law presumes negligence in such rear-end collisions, and nothing in the defense testimony could overcome that presumption.

Following the crash, our client began experiencing significant pain and neurological symptoms. Diagnostic testing revealed multiple herniations and bulges in her lumbar and cervical spine, along with symptoms consistent with traumatic brain injury. She underwent conservative treatment, including extensive therapy and two rounds of lumbar epidural steroid injections, but her pain persisted.

In litigation, we were able to get the defense’s own retained physicians to acknowledge the causal relationship between the accident and the injuries. The symptoms included headaches, light sensitivity, vertigo, vision loss, and ongoing chronic back pain, which severely affected her quality of life.

Our client was driving northbound on I-95 when he was struck from behind by a vehicle traveling at highway speed. The force of the impact pushed his Hummer into the cars in front of him, causing a multi-vehicle collision.

After the accident, our client sought treatment for injuries to his neck, back, and shoulders. MRIs revealed multiple herniated discs in both the cervical and lumbar spine, along with shoulder damage. Conservative measures included therapy, epidural injections, and pain management. Ultimately, he required a lumbar decompression and microdiscectomy in 2016.

We pressed for full compensation for his damages, including past and future medical expenses, pain and suffering, and the likelihood of future surgery. The negligence in this rear-end collision was clear, and the long-term consequences of the crash have left our client with permanent limitations that deserve meaningful compensation.

In October 2019, our client was involved in a serious collision at the intersection of Martin Luther King Boulevard and Australian Avenue in Riviera Beach. While turning left with the right of way, he was struck by a gas tanker truck that failed to yield or slow down. The truck driver, who was distracted and on his phone around the time of the crash, admitted he never applied his brakes and attempted to claim the plaintiff drove into him. Photographic evidence and testimony, however, confirmed that the impact was to the rear passenger side of our client’s vehicle, proving that the truck plowed into him while traveling at full speed.

The defense attempted to argue over whether the traffic signal was a green arrow or green light, but this dispute was irrelevant. Regardless, our client had the legal right to proceed with his turn, and the defendant had a heightened duty as a commercial driver to anticipate hazards and ensure intersections were clear. His failure to pay attention and his phone use immediately before and during the crash established clear liability.

As a result of this crash, our client suffered significant injuries to his spine. Diagnostic imaging revealed multiple herniations and disc damage, ultimately requiring a bilateral laminotomy and microdiscectomy surgery at L3–L5. He endured months of treatment, long-term opioid management, and was left with a permanent impairment rating. Despite prior back issues, the medical records and surgical necessity clearly tied his worsening condition and surgical intervention to the 2019 crash.